Process Methodology
No Matter the Size of the Requirement. My Process is the Same!
Stage 1. Strategic Planning
- Abstract existing lease document
- Review rent statements and other Landlord bills to understand current lease economics.
- Perform remaining obligation analysis.
- Perform needs assessment.
- Size
- Timing
- Technical requirements (If any)
- Space programming
- Geographic parameters
- Scenario planning
- Preliminary financial analysis
- Budget discussion
Stage 2. Option Development
- Conduct space survey.
- Space inquiries and landlord/listing agent outreach.
- Identify off-market opportunities.
- Review potential options with client.
- Conduct space tours.
- Determine whether other professionals such as an architect or contractor are needed to assist.
- Prepare a comparative matrix of options.
- Develop short list of options.
Stage 3. Transaction Implementation
- Draft proposals
- Prepare financial and qualitative analysis of all Landlord responses.
- Submit counter proposals for final options. Make it clear to the respective Landlords that we have multiple good options thus creating leverage in the negotiation.
- Analyze next round of responses and select a prime candidate to conclude a negotiation with.
- Request a lease document.
- Engage a real estate attorney.
- Prepare issues list related to the lease.
- Finalize lease negotiation.
The Method Behind a Successful Office Lease
Leasing office space is often treated as a sequence of actions — tour buildings, compare rents, negotiate improvements, sign a lease.
In reality, the outcome is determined long before a proposal is drafted.
The financial and operational success of an office lease comes from preparation, positioning, and controlled competition.
The physical space is simply the final result of those earlier decisions.
My methodology is designed to shape the negotiation environment before the negotiation begins.
Every engagement follows the same strategic framework regardless of company size, industry, or requirement.
Understanding the Requirement Before Entering the Market
Most companies begin by asking: What space is available?
The more important question is: What leverage will the tenant have when negotiating it?
Before identifying buildings, we first analyze your current position and future change.
If a tenant does not understand its own flexibility, growth expectations, and timing, the landlord defines them instead — and prices the lease accordingly.
We begin with a detailed review of the existing lease and occupancy obligations.
This includes financial exposure, expiration timing, escalation structure, and hidden constraints that may affect relocation or renewal decisions. Many companies underestimate how their current lease affects their negotiating posture in the next one.
From there, we define the real requirement — not only square footage, but how the business is expected to evolve during the lease term. Expansion potential, contraction risk, and operational needs must be accounted for before the search begins, because those factors influence which buildings will realistically compete for the tenancy.
At this stage we also model multiple occupancy scenarios.
Remaining in place, relocating, delaying, or accelerating timing all change leverage differently. The purpose is not to predict the future, but to prevent the lease from restricting it.
Only after the requirement is strategically clear do we enter the market.
Creating Competition Instead of Searching for Space
Tenants often believe they are choosing among buildings.
In practice, landlords decide how aggressively they will compete for a tenant.
Our objective is to ensure multiple owners believe they have a credible opportunity to secure the tenancy.
We survey the market selectively, not broadly. Buildings are identified based on negotiating posture — ownership structure, vacancy conditions, timing considerations, and portfolio objectives — not simply aesthetics or location alone.
During this stage, we quietly establish landlord engagement.
Initial inquiries and discussions are used to measure flexibility and motivation before tours occur. By the time a space is physically visited, we already understand how each owner is likely to negotiate.
Tours therefore become confirmatory rather than exploratory.
As viable options emerge, we construct a competitive environment.
The goal is not to pressure a tenant into choosing quickly, but to allow landlords to develop proposals under uncertainty. Meaningful concessions rarely appear when an owner believes they have already been selected.
When handled properly, multiple acceptable options exist simultaneously — and leverage begins to form naturally.
Structuring the Economics and Executing the Transaction
Rent is the most visible number in a lease and usually the least important over time.
Once proposals are submitted, we analyze the entire economic structure of each offer. Escalations, operating expense calculations, improvement allowances, free rent timing, renewal language, and flexibility provisions determine the actual cost of occupancy across the lease term.
Rather than negotiating a single point, we reshape the full financial framework so long-term exposure is controlled. A lower rent with unfavorable escalation language can cost significantly more than a higher rent with proper structure.
Landlords respond differently when they understand a tenant is evaluating total economics instead of a headline figure. Negotiations therefore shift from persuasion to competition.
After a preferred direction is identified, legal documentation begins.
At this stage the largest risks are no longer financial but contractual. Lease language governs assignment rights, expansion ability, exit conditions, and operating cost protections — issues that often affect companies years after occupancy.
We coordinate closely with counsel to ensure business flexibility is preserved.
A lease should accommodate change, not penalize it.
The transaction concludes only when both the economics and the language support the company’s long’s term operation, not simply the initial occupancy.
Structuring the Economics and Executing the Transaction
Rent is the most visible number in a lease and usually the least important over time.
Once proposals are submitted, we analyze the entire economic structure of each offer. Escalations, operating expense calculations, improvement allowances, free rent timing, renewal language, and flexibility provisions determine the actual cost of occupancy across the lease term.
Rather than negotiating a single point, we reshape the full financial framework so long-term exposure is controlled. A lower rent with unfavorable escalation language can cost significantly more than a higher rent with proper structure.
Landlords respond differently when they understand a tenant is evaluating total economics instead of a headline figure. Negotiations therefore shift from persuasion to competition.
After a preferred direction is identified, legal documentation begins.
At this stage the largest risks are no longer financial but contractual. Lease language governs assignment rights, expansion ability, exit conditions, and operating cost protections — issues that often affect companies years after occupancy.
We coordinate closely with counsel to ensure business flexibility is preserved.
A lease should accommodate change, not penalize it.
The transaction concludes only when both the economics and the language support the company’s long’s term operation, not simply the initial occupancy.
WHY THIS APPROACH MATTERS
Companies typically evaluate an office based on how it looks on the day they move in.
The lease, however, determines how the space functions over the next decade.
Most lease regret does not come from choosing the wrong building.
It comes from signing the right space under the wrong structure.
By focusing first on leverage, then on competition, and finally on documentation, the negotiation is controlled at each stage rather than reacted to at the end.
The result is not just a completed lease — but a stable occupancy strategy.
Before touring space, it is worth understanding how the market is likely to respond to your requirement.
A short discussion can often identify whether your timing currently provides negotiating leverage or limits it.
Schedule a conversation
Informational and without obligation